<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D300 sample from Spain</title>
	<link>http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/nikon-d300-sample-from-spain/</link>
	<description>solution for our digital world</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: xpherion</title>
		<link>http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/nikon-d300-sample-from-spain/#comment-2123</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/nikon-d300-sample-from-spain/#comment-2123</guid>
					<description>Sorry to say that firmware on Nikon D300 is 0.xxx, that means pre-production version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to say that firmware on Nikon D300 is 0.xxx, that means pre-production version.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Artwork</title>
		<link>http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/nikon-d300-sample-from-spain/#comment-2118</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/nikon-d300-sample-from-spain/#comment-2118</guid>
					<description>The problem is that you have seen a beta version firmware made picture!!!
Did you see that the ISO low1 (ISO 100) is not to see as a detail in the exif data??? The version no. begins with 0.xxx! And you made a serious review! Or your camera did have the 1.xxx firmware? Because that could be interesting!

Please tell me if you have tested the D300 with the 0.xxx or with the 1.xxx firmware! Because I have seen almost the same as you did, but with the 0.xxx. And if it stays with the 1.xxx too, than ... :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that you have seen a beta version firmware made picture!!!<br />
Did you see that the ISO low1 (ISO 100) is not to see as a detail in the exif data??? The version no. begins with 0.xxx! And you made a serious review! Or your camera did have the 1.xxx firmware? Because that could be interesting!</p>
<p>Please tell me if you have tested the D300 with the 0.xxx or with the 1.xxx firmware! Because I have seen almost the same as you did, but with the 0.xxx. And if it stays with the 1.xxx too, than &#8230; <img src='http://www.xpherion.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

