<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real world Nikon D300 comparison with D200</title>
	<link>http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/real-world-nikon-d300-comparison-with-d200/</link>
	<description>solution for our digital world</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: xpherion</title>
		<link>http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/real-world-nikon-d300-comparison-with-d200/#comment-1990</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/real-world-nikon-d300-comparison-with-d200/#comment-1990</guid>
					<description>You have to remember that not all the P&#038;S camera can take ISO 3200 shots. High ISO shots are dominated by DSLRs like canon and now nikon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to remember that not all the P&#038;S camera can take ISO 3200 shots. High ISO shots are dominated by DSLRs like canon and now nikon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/real-world-nikon-d300-comparison-with-d200/#comment-1988</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/photography/real-world-nikon-d300-comparison-with-d200/#comment-1988</guid>
					<description>Wow that is some difference.  It seems as though an even cheaper camera would be better than the D200!.  I wonder what the exact settings were when these pictures were taken?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that is some difference.  It seems as though an even cheaper camera would be better than the D200!.  I wonder what the exact settings were when these pictures were taken?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
