Comments on: Demonoid still Offline http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/technology/demonoid-still-offline/ solution for our digital world Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:30:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: xpherion http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/technology/demonoid-still-offline/#comment-1630 Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:48:11 +0000 http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/technology/demonoid-still-offline/#comment-1630 Following wikipedia has some info about this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonoid_(BitTorrent) Also Ruzsteroid Temporary Forum (http://www.ruzster.com/) Following wikipedia has some info about this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonoid_(BitTorrent)
Also Ruzsteroid Temporary Forum (http://www.ruzster.com/)

]]> by: Boob http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/technology/demonoid-still-offline/#comment-1627 Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:52:57 +0000 http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/technology/demonoid-still-offline/#comment-1627 What you have to ask yourself is that if the tracker is back and it IS only hardware problems.. then WHY hasn't Deimos made any statements? Why no notification page? The Irc channel is as much in the dark as everyone else (not to mention being moderated by people who ARE NOT recognised moderators) .. so WTF is going on? What you have to ask yourself is that if the tracker is back and it IS only hardware problems.. then WHY hasn’t Deimos made any statements? Why no notification page?

The Irc channel is as much in the dark as everyone else (not to mention being moderated by people who ARE NOT recognised moderators) .. so WTF is going on?

]]> by: rctay http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/technology/demonoid-still-offline/#comment-1617 Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:17:01 +0000 http://www.xpherion.com/wp/index.php/technology/demonoid-still-offline/#comment-1617 this is grossly inaccurate at your time of writing (around now). The torrent tracker *is* responsive. Such inaccuracies do no favours for the rest of your article. this is grossly inaccurate at your time of writing (around now). The torrent tracker *is* responsive. Such inaccuracies do no favours for the rest of your article.

]]>